Report & Reflection Custom Paper

Assignment 2: Report & Reflection

• Word limit: 1000-1500 words. You will incur penalties if you exceed the word limit.
• Essay template is available on WebLearn > Assessment Details > Assignment 2
Essay question: What are some important tools needed for career development?
Reflect on how your assessment results could be applied to the workplace.
FOR THE ASSESSMENT REFLECTION, YOU MSUT CHOOSE A DIFFERENT TEST FROM LAST TIME.
Your report structure/subheadings are outlined below:
1. Introduction (150-200 words)
You should include a hook, background and an outline.
2. Career development & employability (around 600 words)
• What are the tools and what do they mean?
• Why are they important for employability or career development?
• What are some tips or strategies for developing them?
You must use citations when referencing work, ideas and theories that are not yours.

Click here to place an order for this or any other related assignment

3. Assessment Reflection (around 400 words)
Step 1: Go to this website https://qahecareersonline.careercentre.me
Step 2: Log in using your London Met email and the unique password given to you by the
Careers Team (sent to your university email)
Step 3: Click Test Yourself > All Assessments
Step 4: Choose ONE of the 14 tests available, take the test and read the results.
FOR THE ASSESSMENT REFLECTION, YOU MSUT CHOOSE A DIFFERENT TEST FROM LAST TIME.
In your reflection, you should:
• explain which assessment you chose and why;
• summarise the results of the assessment;
• explain how you will use these results for career development and at workplace
4. Conclusion You should summarise your work (150-200 words)
5. Bibliography (at least 3 credible reference – not included in the word count)
This assignment is weighted at 40%.
General
Level 3/4
o Acquisition of broad knowledge
o Evaluate information
o Use information to plan, develop and problem solve
70-100
(A)
Very good Demonstration of very good comprehension of the task with
evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal
Use of a wide variety of appropriate sources Transformation of knowledge
Independent thinking and development of ideas Ability to communication
very clearly and effectively
Very good evidence of preparation
Very good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errors
Good references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). No errors in
reference list or citations.
60-69 (B)
Very good Demonstration of very good comprehension of the task with
evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation
Use of a wide variety of appropriate sources Transformation of knowledge
Independent thinking and development of ideas Ability to communication
clearly and effectively Very good evidence of preparation
Very good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errors
Good references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). Minimal or no
errors in reference list or citations.
50-59
(C)
Adequate – Satisfactory Some analysis but limited
Some insight and exploration of ideas Sound conclusions No significant
inaccuracies or omissions
Some analysis, evaluation or synthesis of information
Lacking clarity at times Some evidence of preparation Referencing is
sound. Mostly appropriate sources. Numerous
errors or inconsistencies
40-49 (D)
All learning outcomes met
Competent (practical) May be incomplete in knowledge (some errors or
omissions) Insufficient analysis, evaluation or synthesis Limited application of
theories/knowledge
An awareness of appropriate principles/theories/techniques
Irrelevance to the task at times
Disorganised work with weak standard of presentation Numerous
aberrations
from the requirements of the task
Referencing is attempted although may be inconsistent, many errors, weak
sources
Condoned
Pass 30-39
(F1)
Learning outcomes not met
Little relevant knowledge Lacking structure Numerous errors in structure and
form Limited understanding of concepts/theories
No appropriate analysis, evaluation or synthesis Significant
inaccuracies/omissions Not competent
Little or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with errors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *