In the article, Jerry B. Harvey uses the Abilene Paradox to explain how individuals and organization regularly take actions that are contrary to what they had planned to do, thus fail in the objective they are trying to achieve. In the Abilene Paradox, Jerry, his wife, mother, and father-in-law end up going to Abilene to have dinner, yet none of them wanted to go out for dinner since the weather was unfavorable and the means of transportation to Abilene not suitable for the weather. The author believes it is important for the readers to understand his point of view since most people and organizations have problems in attaining their well-stated goals, mostly due to the inability to manage agreements.
The Abilene Paradox deepens the understanding of individuals in groups, group behavior, and group dynamics by explaining how poor agreement in groups would result in a lack of goal achievement. In most cases, poor agreements in groups are a result of improper communication among group members. Knowledge gained from the article by Jerry B. Harvey can be applied to group dynamics in ensuring effective communication and effective agreement, thus facilitating group goal achievement. Effective communication and agreement would, therefore, facilitate focus and clarity of objective; hence group goal achievement (Newstrom & Davis, 2011).
In my own experience, I have always ended up not meeting my daily goals due to engagements with other people. For example, I may sometimes not be able to make it for a group meeting due to other engagements that may not be of priority, in preparation for the meeting. The meeting preparation engagement may consume a lot of time, which results to the postponing of the meeting.
Newstrom, J. W., & Davis, K. (2011). Human behavior at work. New York. McGraw-Hill.